🧬 BDNF Extraction Viewer

Извлечено: 997 / 997 (100.0%) Средняя confidence: 0.13
← Назад к списку

Causal Relationship Between Neurotrophins and Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Insights From a Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

PMID: 41913636 · DOI: 10.1002/brb3.71309 · Brain and behavior, 2026 · Tao Xu, Qiang Gan, Handong Wang, Haifeng Liu, Xiwen Huang
📄 Abstract

Researchers have postulated a link between higher levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and more favorable outcomes in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). However, there is no clear evidence regarding the causal association between neurotrophins and NPH. To delve deeper into this potential connection, scientists employed a rigorous method known as bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR). This technique was utilized to explore the causal impact of various neurotrophins-such as BDNF, nerve growth factor (NGF), neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), NT-4, ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)-on the development or progression of NPH. To investigate the causal relationship between five neurotrophin subtypes and NPH, we designed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study using comprehensive genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. Our primary approach involved the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. We also conducted reverse causality analysis to ensure robustness. Furthermore, we implemented complementary methods like the weighted median (WM), weighted mode, and MR-Egger to strengthen our findings. Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, leave-one-out, and Cochran's Q tests, were employed to validate results, explore heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and pinpoint potential biases. MR analysis of genetic prediction showed no statistical association of neurotrophins on NPH. However, a reverse analysis indicated a causal association between NPH and two neurotrophins: CNTF and GDNF. Specifically, individuals with NPH had a lower risk of CNTF (odds ratio: 0.7963, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.6537 to 0.9701, p = 0.0237) and a slightly reduced risk of GDNF (odds ratio: 0.9576, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.9226 to 0.9940, p = 0.0230). MR-Egger regression showed that pleiotropy did not affect the analysis. In addition, MR-PRESSO detected no outliers, and a leave-one-out analysis verified the robustness of the results. NPH was negatively and causally associated with CNTF and GDNF. Additional research is crucial to uncover the underlying mechanisms and devise strategies, including nutritional guidelines, to prevent NPH.

Confidence: 0.05 · 2 полей извлечено
Идентификация (6 полей)
Target
0.00
Alt. target
0.00
Protein family
0.00
Functional class
0.00
Subcellular loc.
0.00
Isoforms (metab/obesity)
0.00
Механизм действия (21 полей)
Mechanism
0.00
Mutations (obesity/lean)
0.00
Activity (obesity)
0.00
Activity temporal
0.00
Energy balance
0.00
Appetite
0.00
Fat metabolism
0.00
Lipolysis
0.00
Thermogenesis
0.00
Muscle metabolism
0.00
Inflammation
0.00
Glucose metabolism
0.00
AA metabolism
0.00
Hormonal pathways
0.00
Cell death
0.00
Adipocyte fibrosis
0.00
Upstream (biochem)
0.00
Upstream (physiol)
0.00
Downstream (biochem)
0.00
Downstream (physiol)
0.00
PTMs
0.00
Экспрессия (8 полей)
Tissue expression
0.00
In vitro
0.00
In vivo
0.00
In silico
Mendelian randomization study using GWAS data
0.90
Genetic association
Mendelian randomization study using GWAS data
0.90
Ex vivo
0.00
Animal model
0.00
Diet/model
0.00
Клиника (11 полей)